Homework help that gives hints instead of answers

Updated

The short answer

AI help that hands you the answer can raise homework scores and still lower what you learn. In a 2025 PNAS study, students given a ChatGPT-style chat scored 17% lower on a later exam than students with no AI, while students given a tutor built to give hints scored about the same.

What the research found

Two large studies, run in very different ways, point the same direction. When students used AI to get answers, their practice or homework scores went up and their exam scores went down. When the AI was set up to give hints, or when students kept doing the work themselves, most of that loss went away.

A field experiment with about 1,000 high school students

Bastani and colleagues ran a randomized trial at a high school in Turkey in fall 2023 and published it in PNAS in 2025. Nearly 1,000 students in grades 9 to 11 took four 90-minute math review sessions. Each class was assigned to one of three groups for the practice part of every session:

After practice, everyone took a closed-book exam without AI. Each exam problem was very close to one of the practice problems.

Group Practice, with AI Exam, without AI
GPT Base (ChatGPT-style chat) 48% higher than control 17% lower than control
GPT Tutor (hints, with guardrails) 127% higher than control About the same as control

The researchers looked at what students typed. In the GPT Base group, students most often asked for the answer and copied it. In the GPT Tutor group, they more often asked for help or tried an answer first. Students in the GPT Base group didn't think they had learned less, even though their exam scores showed it.

Two more details matter if you use a general chatbot for math. When the researchers asked GPT Base “What is the answer?” ten times for each of the 57 practice problems, it gave a correct answer only 51% of the time. And the hint-only tutor removed the harm without raising exam scores above the control group. Knowledge at Wharton has a plain-language summary of the same results.

The authors name the study's limits themselves: one school, one subject, short-term outcomes, and AI models from 2023.

30 months of school records for 26,811 students

A June 2026 CEPR discussion paper by David Strömberg, Victor Lei and Yanhui Wu followed 26,811 students in grades 7 to 12 at nine schools in one county in central China. It combined 30 months of school records (weekly homework scores and completion times, monthly closed-book exams, and the high school and college entrance exams) with a June 2025 survey that asked each student when they started using AI. It then compared students before and after they started, against students who hadn't started yet. Because students chose when to start, this is an observational study, so it can't rule out every other explanation the way a randomized trial can. The authors run several checks on their design.

What they found:

Most students in the study used general chat apps that give quick answers. Fortune covered the paper on July 21, 2026.

What tutoring research says about help at each step

Older research on tutoring points the same way. In a 2011 review in Educational Psychologist, Kurt VanLehn compared human tutors, computer tutors and no tutoring across many experiments. Compared with no tutoring, human tutors had an average effect size of 0.79, and computer tutors that give hints and feedback on each step of a problem averaged 0.76. Tutors that gave feedback only on the final answer averaged 0.31 (VanLehn's summary table). Help on each step did much better than help on the answer alone.

Research on productive failure suggests that trying first helps too. A 2021 meta-analysis by Tanmay Sinha and Manu Kapur pooled 53 studies that compared students who tried problems before being taught with students who were taught first. Trying first had a moderate advantage (Hedges' g = 0.36). The authors note one exception: for younger children, in grades 2 to 5, being taught first worked better.

How to use AI for homework without it doing the work

The common thread in these studies is effort. Students who kept doing the thinking did about as well as students without AI. Students who let the AI do the thinking did worse, and in the PNAS study they didn't notice. These habits keep the thinking with you.

  1. Try the problem first. Write every step by hand before you ask for anything. A wrong step is useful, because it shows exactly where the idea broke.
  2. Ask about one step. “Is my third line right?” or “What should I check in this step?” gets you help where you need it. “What's the answer?” skips the part that teaches you.
  3. Ask for one hint at a time. Tell the tool not to show the solution. Make the next step yourself before you ask again.
  4. Check the answer yourself. Substitute it back into the original problem. The guide to checking handwritten math step by step shows how.
  5. Watch your time. If AI cuts your homework time sharply while your scores jump, that's the pattern the CEPR paper linked to lower exam scores.
  6. Redo a similar problem with no help. Both studies measured learning with closed-book exams, and a fresh problem with nothing open is the quickest way to find out whether you've got it.
  7. Follow your class's rules. Some teachers allow AI for hints and some don't allow it at all. Ask when you're not sure.

What to look for in a homework help tool

ChatGPT has a study mode for this. OpenAI's help page says it can guide you with questions instead of giving the answer right away, and that it can make mistakes and sometimes gives a direct answer. The comparison with ChatGPT study mode goes through the differences, and what to look for in an AI math tutor app for iPad has a fuller checklist.

How alai approaches it

alai is an iPad and web notes app with Ally, an adaptive AI tutor that teaches alongside you. In Homework help, you write each step yourself, and Ally doesn't interrupt while your steps are right. When a step goes wrong, Ally points at the first wrong line and gives one short hint about it, usually a question, in a single sentence. Ally is set up not to say the corrected step or the final answer while you work. If you stay stuck, the next hint gets smaller and more concrete.

For example, under 3(x + 4) = 2x + 19, someone writes 3x + 4 = 2x + 19. Ally underlines the +4 and asks, “Did the 3 reach every term inside the brackets?” Then Ally waits while you fix it.

When you bring a worksheet, alai reads the page, finds the problems and works out an answer key for each one, which Ally uses when checking your steps. Ally also remembers which mistakes you've made before and which hints helped you fix them. Ally can still misread messy handwriting or get something wrong, so it's worth checking your final answer yourself.

alai is for students 13 and older in the US (a parent sets it up for a child under 13), and it has a free plan. How alai works walks through a session from the first line to Ally's question.

Questions

Does using AI for homework hurt learning?

It can. In both studies on this page, students who used AI to get answers did worse on later closed-book exams, even though their practice or homework scores rose. Students who used a hint-only tutor, or who kept spending the same time on homework, did about as well as students without AI.

Is using AI for homework cheating?

That depends on your class, since many teachers set their own rules. Check the syllabus or ask your teacher. Where AI is allowed, using it for hints on steps you've already tried keeps the learning with you.

What's the difference between a hint and an answer?

An answer tells you what to write. A hint points at the part that went wrong and asks you something about it, so you still make the step yourself.

Does ChatGPT study mode give answers?

OpenAI says study mode is designed to guide you with questions, but it may sometimes give a direct answer and it can make mistakes. You can ask it for hints, or for one question at a time, instead.

Sources